How should traditioForm be structured? about cei2tei HOT 4 CLOSED

Types:

• original
• copy (VID 53)
  ** simple (VID 55)
  ** authentic (VID 54)
  ** figurée (VID 56)
  ** chancellery (VID 57)
  ** registered (VID 58)
  ** notarial (VID 59)
  ** judicial (VID 60)
  ** exemplification (VID 61)
  ** certified (VID 62)
  ** collation (VID 63)
  ** insertion (VID 65) -- isn't this just a different type of copy placed inside another document?
  ** inspeximus (VID 67-69)
  ** cartulary (VID 74)
• Unknown

can we collapse this list into a more manageable form?

from cei2tei.

Perhaps something like:

<traditioForm type="copy" subtype="simple">
    copy of the Bull 
        <bibl>"Cum nos hodie"
        </bibl>
</traditioForm>

from cei2tei.

An alternative to <traditioForm> is to use <derivation> from corpus. The <interaction> elements could be used to replace our custom elements for issuer and recipent, etc.

from cei2tei.

Deciding on: original, copy, draft, unknown

from cei2tei.