Ignores js files about haml-rails HOT 4 CLOSED

that's not how this engine works, as far as I know. sounds like a good opportunity for a pull request, maybe? :)

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:02 AM, ☃ pitr [email protected] wrote:

It doesn't seem that assets under app/assets/javascripts/ are compiled by haml.

There's a gem angular-rails-templates that takes files like app/assets/javascript/templates/settings.html and converts them to JS files that insert HTML template into angular's template cache. My understanding is that we should be able to name files template.html.haml, which would be processed by HAML first to generate HTML, then by angular-rails-templates to generate JS. This doesn't seem to work and the behaviour is very odd. Please see pitr/angular-rails-templates#18 for more info

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#67

from haml-rails.

I thought that's how sprockets works

EDIT: or rails magical extension naming

from haml-rails.

Sprockets doesn’t know about Angular’s template cache, so that gem must be doing something special. Maybe you can copy whatever special thing that is into this gem if you want that.

On Mar 3, 2014, at 11:48 AM, ☃ pitr [email protected] wrote:

I thought that's how sprockets works

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

from haml-rails.

All we are doing is registering engine with sprockets which extends from Tilt::Template

from haml-rails.