Minting issue: Error: Invalid number of parameters for "mint". Got 1 expected 2! about hashlips_nft_minting_dapp HOT 11 OPEN

Try changing line 133 in App.js to .mint(blockchain.account, mintAmount) Make sure to save before you give it a go. The smart contract which is explained int the Hashlips video takes 2 parameters (Blockchain account and mint amount). If you have copy/paste his code directly you can see that he is taking the minting amount only. He mentions this in the readme file. In order to work you have to either edit your smart contract to take only 1 parameter or add the blockchain account as I told you. I assume it will be easier to add the address inside.

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

/Users/thyechin.lam/Desktop/Screen Shot 2022-02-11 at 11.22.00 PM.png

I having same issue as well

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

You will need to offer more for someone to help you, Look at your smart contract and look at your mint function it will look something like this _safeMint(address to, tokenURI) or _mint(address to, tokenURI) or amount or something else, then you will need to find out what you are not getting from the minting dapp.

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

/Users/thyechin.lam/Desktop/Screen Shot 2022-02-11 at 11.22.00 PM.png

I having same issue as well

same solution most likely ^

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

Replace your ABI with right one. Worked for me

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

My line 133 looks like that now and it works! thanks @Ivan-Dosev
.mint(blockchain.account, mintAmount)

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

My line 133 looks like that now and it works! thanks @Ivan-Dosev
.mint(blockchain.account, mintAmount)

You are very welcome, my friend :)

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

still have same issue

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

Hi Everyone, I am having the same issue. I have already deployed my contract and am attempting to launch a Minting Dapp using Bubble.io. Can i edit my smart Contract after it has been deployed? the app builder is looking for a second parameter is there something i can enter as a second parameter. i seem to be going around in circles. here is our smart contract..

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0

// Created by HashLips
// The Nerdy Coder Clones

pragma solidity ^0.8.0;

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Enumerable.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";

contract PLUTOGANG is ERC721Enumerable, Ownable {
using Strings for uint256;

string public baseURI;
string public baseExtension = ".json";
uint256 public cost = 0.04 ether;
uint256 public maxSupply = 10000;
uint256 public maxMintAmount = 50;
bool public paused = false;
mapping(address => bool) public whitelisted;

constructor(
string memory _name,
string memory _symbol,
string memory _initBaseURI
) ERC721(_name, _symbol) {
setBaseURI(_initBaseURI);
mint(msg.sender, 50);
}

// internal
function _baseURI() internal view virtual override returns (string memory) {
return baseURI;
}

// public
function mint(address _to, uint256 _mintAmount) public payable {
uint256 supply = totalSupply();
require(!paused);
require(_mintAmount > 0);
require(_mintAmount <= maxMintAmount);
require(supply + _mintAmount <= maxSupply);

if (msg.sender != owner()) {
    if(whitelisted[msg.sender] != true) {
      require(msg.value >= cost * _mintAmount);
    }
}

for (uint256 i = 1; i <= _mintAmount; i++) {
  _safeMint(_to, supply + i);
}

}

function walletOfOwner(address _owner)
public
view
returns (uint256[] memory)
{
uint256 ownerTokenCount = balanceOf(_owner);
uint256[] memory tokenIds = new uint256;
for (uint256 i; i < ownerTokenCount; i++) {
tokenIds[i] = tokenOfOwnerByIndex(_owner, i);
}
return tokenIds;
}

function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId)
public
view
virtual
override
returns (string memory)
{
require(
_exists(tokenId),
"ERC721Metadata: URI query for nonexistent token"
);

string memory currentBaseURI = _baseURI();
return bytes(currentBaseURI).length > 0
    ? string(abi.encodePacked(currentBaseURI, tokenId.toString(), baseExtension))
    : "";

}

//only owner
function setCost(uint256 _newCost) public onlyOwner {
cost = _newCost;
}

function setmaxMintAmount(uint256 _newmaxMintAmount) public onlyOwner {
maxMintAmount = _newmaxMintAmount;
}

function setBaseURI(string memory _newBaseURI) public onlyOwner {
baseURI = _newBaseURI;
}

function setBaseExtension(string memory _newBaseExtension) public onlyOwner {
baseExtension = _newBaseExtension;
}

function pause(bool _state) public onlyOwner {
paused = _state;
}

function whitelistUser(address _user) public onlyOwner {
whitelisted[_user] = true;
}

function removeWhitelistUser(address _user) public onlyOwner {
whitelisted[_user] = false;
}

function withdraw() public payable onlyOwner {
require(payable(msg.sender).send(address(this).balance));
}
}

thanks in advance for any help.

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

Thanks man, it works

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.

Try changing line 133 in App.js to .mint(blockchain.account, mintAmount) Make sure to save before you give it a go. The smart contract which is explained int the Hashlips video takes 2 parameters (Blockchain account and mint amount). If you have copy/paste his code directly you can see that he is taking the minting amount only. He mentions this in the readme file. In order to work you have to either edit your smart contract to take only 1 parameter or add the blockchain account as I told you. I assume it will be easier to add the address inside.

You are the god who saved my project. Thank you buddy.

from hashlips_nft_minting_dapp.