(sorry to bother you again...)

Using the default template, documenting properties of an ES2015 class is just a matter of adding a @type annotation to each property (whether it's an instance property, an instance getter, or a static getter). Properties appear under the "Members" section.

For the FinderError class in this file:
https://github.com/cedx/which.js/blob/master/lib/finder.js#L137

The default template output is:

But when using the Tidy template, the "members" section is skipped:

Whatever class property I'm documenting, they never appear in the generated output.
Another example is the static getter Finder.isWindows from the same source file:
https://github.com/cedx/which.js/blob/master/lib/finder.js#L15

It appears in the "Members" section with the default template, but not with the Tidy template.

I prefer to use @typedef for documenting options objects. But currently, the output of type definitions is not very useful: it only displays the @type annotation but not the @property ones.
It would be very cool if @property annotations were also displayed.

There is no output for @summary & @return description

Source code of the page

<h1>
    <a href="./">
      Module
    </a>
  </h1>

Should be

<h1>
    <a href="./index.html">
      Module
    </a>
  </h1>

Cause some browsers to not open the readme page, but the directory list of, instead

Given the following JavaScript:

const TestClass = class TestClass {
  /**
   * Create a TestClass instance.
   * @class TestClass
   * @classdesc TestClass represents an object of some sort.
   * @author Bob Smith <[email protected]>
   * @param {(number|string)} value - Some value passed in.
   */
  constructor(value) {
    this._ctorValue = this.constructor.validationRegExp.test(value) ? value : 'someDefaultValue';
  }

  /**
   * Returns some arbitrary value given the supplied parameter.
   * @static
   * @param {string} value - A string.
   * @returns {string} Given the following input: "ABC" would return "A".
   */
  static getArbitraryValue(value) {
    return value[0];
  }


  /**
   * Returns a regular expression (RegExp) which indicates a valid TestClass value.
   * @static
   * @readonly
   * @property {regExp} validationRegExp
   */
  static get validationRegExp() {
    return /^\w+$/;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the arbitrary value from a valid TestClass value.
   * @instance
   * @readonly
   * @property {string} arbitraryValue - Given the following input: "ABC" would return "A".
   */
  get arbitraryValue() {
    return this.constructor.getArbitraryValue(this._ctorValue);
  }
};

When running this through the standard JSDOC3 template, compared to the tidy-jsdoc template, some fields appear to be missing. Speficially, the static and readonly descriptors for members / properties. In addition, some of the descriptive text is missing in the members / properties (also links to the source for the members / properties would be nice to have):

My JSDOC config is simple, and that looks like:

  const jsDocConfig = {
    opts: {
      destination: './docs',
      template: '../node_modules/tidy-jsdoc'
    },
    metadata: {
      title: 'Some Example'
    }
  };

relevant package.json:

{
  "jsdoc": "^3.6.3",
  "tidy-jsdoc": "^1.2.2"
}

Is this something which can be solved through a configuration, or would this require a change within tidy-jsdoc?

Can you please add support for the @hideconstructor tag?

--- a/tmpl/method.tmpl
+++ b/tmpl/method.tmpl
@@ -19,3 +19,3 @@ var hasMethodSummary = (data.kind !== 'class')
 
-<?js if (data.kind !== 'module') { ?>
+<?js if (data.kind !== 'module' && !data.hideconstructor) { ?>
 
@@ -50,3 +50,3 @@ var hasMethodSummary = (data.kind !== 'class')
 
-<?js if (data.kind !== 'module' && data.description) { ?>
+<?js if (data.kind !== 'module' && data.description && !data.hideconstructor) { ?>
 <div class="method-description">
@@ -76,3 +76,3 @@ var hasMethodSummary = (data.kind !== 'class')
 
-<?js if (data.params && params.length) { ?>
+<?js if (data.params && params.length && !data.hideconstructor) { ?>
     <h4 class="method-heading">Parameters</h4>

Thank you!