Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (7)

dbouget avatar dbouget commented on September 27, 2024 2

Hi @gusSCIMOV,
I've added a new notebook regarding how to run the postoperative GBM segmentation model, and a second notebook including the postoperative reporting step.

Don't hesitate to re-open this issue if you need additional help!

from raidionics.

gusSCIMOV avatar gusSCIMOV commented on September 27, 2024 1

Hi
I've been working a time ago with many of the Colab notebooks added in "processing backend for performing segmentation and computation of standardized report (RADS)" coming up from this request by the way. It has been quite useful

I just wondering if I might get the BRATs-like output (Edema, enhancing, necrosis) using just the post-operative scans using the MRI_GBM_Postop_FV_1p or FV_3p, instead of the whole tumor mask, does it make sense now?

Thanks, a really appreciate your help

from raidionics.

andreped avatar andreped commented on September 27, 2024 1

@gusSCIMOV AFAIK, there has not been trained such a model for postoperative scans (yet). But I know @dbouget is working on expanding the model to include more classes in the postoperative case. However, I am not sure what the status is on that. Likely still a WIP.

I believe @dbouget is on holiday till Tuesday. He will likely not reply until then at the earliest.


NOTE: Next time I recommend making a separate issue and referring to this old issue (if relevant) instead of extending this thread. Making a new issue for this, makes it easier for us to track "unsolved" issues and for others to potentially find solutions to their own problems. I hope you understand :]

from raidionics.

gusSCIMOV avatar gusSCIMOV commented on September 27, 2024

Oh thank you so much for your timely and quick reply. Works pretty good with the Pre-op Post-op pair.
Just a more specific question about it:
Even though we should include the pre-surgical tumor burden to get better estimation of the post-surgery, I'm dealing with a mix of MRI where Pre-operative scans are not always available. In those cases, may I comment and skip the steps involving Pre-op MRI and only use the 4 Post-op modalities? For example; going over and just commenting the full blocks related with "Registration from T1-CE (T0) to T1-CE (T1) or the input[3] and input[4] as well (timestamp 0)

pipeline_json[step_str]["fixed"]["sequence"] = "T1-CE"
pipeline_json[step_str]["description"] = "Registration from T1-CE (T0) to T1-CE (T1)"

pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"] = {}
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["timestamp"] = 0
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["sequence"] = "T1-CE"
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["labels"] = None
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["space"] = {}
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["space"]["timestamp"] = 1
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["3"]["space"]["sequence"] = "T1-CE"
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"] = {}
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["timestamp"] = 0
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["sequence"] = "T1-CE"
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["labels"] = "Tumor"
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["space"] = {}
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["space"]["timestamp"] = 1
pipeline_json[step_str]["inputs"]["4"]["space"]["sequence"] = "T1-CE"

Thanks
GP

from raidionics.

dbouget avatar dbouget commented on September 27, 2024

I've updated the README to the Raidionics model zoo. There are 5 different postop glioblastoma segmentation models, each trained for a specific set of inputs.

If you need to run a model on postop MR scans only, you can look at the following models: MRI_GBM_Postop_FV_1p, MRI_GBM_Postop_FV_2p, and MRI_GBM_Postop_FV_3p. There is a pipeline.json file inside each model folder, where you can copy the actual pipeline required for running the segmentation with the specific model.

from raidionics.

gusSCIMOV avatar gusSCIMOV commented on September 27, 2024

Sure, it would be great if there is some progress in that expanded model

from raidionics.

andreped avatar andreped commented on September 27, 2024

Sure, it would be great if there is some progress in that expanded model

@gusSCIMOV Could you open a separate issue about it, copy-paste the question you had and refer to this issue.

Then I can assign @dbouget to it and he should likely reply soon, when he has time :]

from raidionics.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.