Class instance feature lost when altering the state. about baobab HOT 6 CLOSED

Hello @luccitan. Normally, baobab is not meant to hold anything else than "raw" data. Classes aren't therefore supported as it is quite impossible to reliably clone an instance in every JS engine. There are ways to kinda fake cloning instance but they might have some undesirable side effects.

From here, you have another option, if you really want to keep classes: you can disable the tree's persistence (and hence lose its advantages but, it can be done if persistence is not what you need).

var tree = new Baobab({}, {persistent: false});

If you do so, baobab will only mutate objects given and won't try to shift references along the path by cloning.

from baobab.

Yes you can. It just means you won’t get pure rendering performance gain (which you dont have by default anyway).

from baobab.

It works wonderfully! 👍

Can you explain a little bit more the persistent option please ?
I have read through its documentation in the README but I didn't think it was the solution of my problem.

I would appreciate further information about its usefulness, as I may need the tree's history later. (It's not a concern at the moment)

from baobab.

Persistence is basically useful for 2 use cases:

1. You need to track the history of the data and may want to go back in time easily.
2. You need to be able to determine whether two states of the data are identical or not based only on referential equality === without having to perform a diff.

from baobab.

No. 2 is very useful with view engines like React that can beneficiate from shouldComponentUpdate callbacks that can just check whether references are identical to be able to take the decision to render again or not.

from baobab.

Does that mean that I can't use baobab-react with a Baobab tree without persistence ? 🤔

from baobab.