Comments (4)
Must the artifact provide data and tools to replicate ALL experiments in a paper, or is it allowable to scope an artifact to consider only part of the claims?
By default yes, unless it is not allowed due to other issues (e.g. IP). The burden should be on the authors to justify why some parts of the artefact where not made public.
Who decides (authors, reviewers or chairs) what claims in a given paper should be supported by the artifact?
All claims in a paper must be supported by the artefact. The authors must be responsible to either ensure this or explain why they cannot. There is no need for someone to decide.
What should we consider "too much data" or "too long of an experiment" that can’t be submitted in full for artifact evaluation? For instance, one researcher might consider a 2GB dataset too large to submit in full, while another might submit a 2TB dataset.
We could have a round 2^32 bytes maximum artefact size :-) Seriously, that should be up to the author.
Whatever the criteria for "too big" is - what process should authors follow if their artefact is too big to submit some subset of their artefact for evaluation?
A representative sample must be extracted from the full dataset. The statistical techniques must be documented by the authors and be subject to evaluation during artefact review. The tools that compose the artefact must be able to work with the sample and produce similar results, within ranges that the authors must describe and explain.
from artifact-evaluation.
In my opinion, if authors do not submit the complete dataset, they should be required to justify that decision. For very large datasets, they can always upload them to archive.org and additionally provide a subset that allows reviewers to test provided scripts. We used the following formation in the MSR 2019 Mining Challenge CfP:
Already upon submission, authors can privately share their anonymized data and software on preserved archives such as Zenodo or Figshare (tutorial available here). Zenodo accepts up to 50GB per dataset (more upon request). There is no need to use Dropbox or Google Drive. After acceptance, data and software should be made public so that they receive a DOI and become citable. Zenodo and Figshare accounts can easily be linked with GitHub repositories to automatically archive software releases. In the unlikely case that authors need to upload terabytes of data, Archive.org may be used.
from artifact-evaluation.
tutorial available here
It’s here on my website: https://ineed.coffee/5205/how-to-disclose-data-for-double-blind-review-and-make-it-archived-open-data-upon-acceptance/
from artifact-evaluation.
Thanks Daniel, forgot to copy the link.
from artifact-evaluation.
Related Issues (9)
- Artifact Automation HOT 2
- Data analysis HOT 2
- Artifact Extendability HOT 1
- Artifact Evaluation Process: Communication HOT 3
- "Artifact Available" badge guidelines HOT 4
- Replicated, Reproduced and functional? HOT 8
- Anonymization of artifacts HOT 1
- Implications of artifact evaluation on paper acceptance HOT 5
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from artifact-evaluation.