availability of v1 branch? about redix HOT 10 CLOSED

to be honest I may not be able to maintain multiple versions, but you can tell me which features you liked and let me think with you how it could be achieved

from redix.

you are under no obligation to maintain the original version, but it would be useful to still have the source code available for people who wish to use, debug and improve on it.
You can put it in a new repository and set it to "archived" so that it will be clear there are no expectations for future work :-)

from redix.

to be honest I may not be able to maintain multiple versions, but you can tell me which features you liked and let me think with you how it could be achieved

like I mentioned here: #39 (comment)
those features are killer so if you want my biased opinion on what you should work on next in v5, there you go.

from redix.

Great, thanks for your response and support

from redix.

I was going to mention that for the WEBHOOKSET <channel> <httpurl>, command, it would actually be really useful if you could somehow allow the user to set a header/s that will be added to the webhook call.
This is because most receiving apps will need some form of X-API-Token,X-Authorization etc

from redix.

Good addon,

by the way I added the support for pub/sub (v5.2.0), so I can add this feature again.

from redix.

amazing! I'll pull the latest version.
thanks again for this project. I really appreciate it.

from redix.

@c-nv-s thanks for your support

from redix.

I was going to mention that for the WEBHOOKSET , command, it would actually be really useful if you could somehow allow the user to set a header/s that will be added to the webhook call.
This is because most receiving apps will need some form of X-API-Token,X-Authorization etc

Is it ok if I raise a ticket for this feature? because it will be very useful for me soon.

from redix.

I was going to mention that for the WEBHOOKSET , command, it would actually be really useful if you could somehow allow the user to set a header/s that will be added to the webhook call.
This is because most receiving apps will need some form of X-API-Token,X-Authorization etc

Is it ok if I raise a ticket for this feature? because it will be very useful for me soon.

Ticket raised because I need this to integrate with some workflow automation tools.

from redix.