The colorpicker is missing about antville HOT 12 CLOSED

Original comment by [email protected] on 16 Nov 2009 at 8:35

• Added labels: Milestone-Release-1.2, Usability

from antville.

The main reason the colorpicker was removed is due to the changed nature of the 
values provided in the layout section: values are completely customizable, 
freely 
definable. Thus, Antville can hardly decide whether a value is about color – 
and thus 
needs a color picker – or just any other data type.

I could check the value’s name for a suffix (e.g. "_color") or generally 
provide the 
colorpicker – which I favor right now.

Another reason for the missing colorpicker is that I wanted to use a 
third-party 
solution and at the time there was no real alternative, especially not for 
jQuery. I 
think now there should be and hopefully it will be useful for Antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 18 Jan 2010 at 10:57

from antville.

Moving to Release 1.3 milestone

Original comment by [email protected] on 30 May 2010 at 1:46

• Added labels: Milestone-Release-1.3
• Removed labels: Milestone-Release-1.2

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 29 May 2011 at 9:08

• Added labels: Milestone-Release-1.4

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 28 Jul 2013 at 8:50

• Added labels: Milestone-Release-1.5
• Removed labels: Milestone-Release-1.4

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Mar 2015 at 4:56

• Changed state: Started

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Mar 2015 at 4:56

from antville.

This issue was closed by revision 649cd144eb09.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Mar 2015 at 5:24

• Changed state: Fixed

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Mar 2015 at 5:51

Attachments:

• [Screen Shot 2015-03-07 at 18.20.23.png](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/antville/issue-39/comment-9/Screen Shot 2015-03-07 at 18.20.23.png)

from antville.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Mar 2015 at 5:59

from antville.

This issue was closed by revision a93b467e8e63.

Original comment by [email protected] on 14 Mar 2015 at 3:18

from antville.

This issue was closed by revision 1ebcbca48e8d.

Original comment by [email protected] on 17 Mar 2015 at 3:24

from antville.