Release tag(s) about wget-lua HOT 10 CLOSED

That tarball came from alard/wget-lua@955376b before this repository was made. I don't know which stable commits people used for projects previously, but I can try to see if automated tagging and builds can be made for the latest and future ones.

from wget-lua.

Another tar ball is mentioned here https://launchpad.net/~archiveteam/+archive/ubuntu/wget-lua/+packages

from wget-lua.

Tagging releases for this would allow me to upload it to archlinux, replacing the currently defunct aur package.

from wget-lua.

Let me know if this is sufficient for you: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/wget-lua/releases/tag/v1.20.3 (Do note that the release refers to the v1.20.3 tag which refers to the v1.20.3-release branch which is based on the v1.20.3 branch but with commit 3000288 setting ./.version and ./.tarball-version to the correct version.)

from wget-lua.

Hi @Fusl! Thanks for taking a crack at this. Can you take a minute to explain what's going on with that release branch vs master? I was kinda surprised that branch seems to have a lot of code which is not in master, specifically 7ea6148 includes +1000 lines (from upstream wget I assume?)

I don't fully understand the development workflow here, but ideally a release tag reference a commit on master if at all possible. I think the need for explicit .version / .tarball-version files is because build-aux/git-version.gen is missing from this repo. It's referenced both in the configure script and the makefile:

If this comment is correct I think a signed tag may remove the need for adding those files onto the leaf branch. But maybe @rockdaboot can shed more light on the intended process.

from wget-lua.

A git tag (not even signed) should do it. The comment was mainly a reminder for myself - I don't have .tarball-version nor build-aux/git-version-gen lying around here (I build from git always).

Sorry for the incovenience, but this is from times before me becoming maintainer - and wget 1.x is in 'maintenance mode' (new stuff goes into wget2), so we won't change it.

Hope that helps a bit 🤷‍♂️

from wget-lua.

@notpeter The individual branches are up to date pulls from the upstream wget repository with the Lua patches manually applied tested. I'll look into undoing the patch for manually applying the version number and release a new tag soon with an -at-lua suffix (including the -at- part was proposed by an team member to make it clear that this is a special Archive Team build).

@rockdaboot Thanks a lot for the note.

from wget-lua.

https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/wget-lua/releases/tag/v1.20.3-at.20200401.01 was just released.

from wget-lua.

I added tags today for all past versions that I'm aware of. This includes all the tarballs on http://warriorhq.archiveteam.org/downloads/wget-lua/ (which also means I imported that entire branch as v1.14.lua) and all the v1.20.3-at versions.

See also the original ArchiveTeam/wget-lua repository which was renamed a while ago to make room for this one: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/wget-lua-og

from wget-lua.

Thank you @JustAnotherArchivist. I very much appreciate the follow through. Have a wonderful day!

from wget-lua.