[FEATURE] Change the name of the generated model class withe name of message name. about modelina HOT 7 OPEN

Happy to accept and help guide a PR 🙂 Otherwise, yes, explicit annotations is the workaround

from modelina.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

from modelina.

Makes sense, taget next @AayushSaini101 ✌️

from modelina.

I just stumbled over this. I ran asyncapi generate models and end up with:

Successfully generated the following models: AnonymousSchema1, AnonymousSchema25, AnonymousSchema28, AnonymousSchema31, AnonymousSchema38, AnonymousSchema41, AnonymousSchema44

I would've expected that the file name as well as the class name do use the actual name of the component / message / whatevs. Is there currently no way or do I have to set some extra annotation somewhere?

from modelina.

What annotation would that be?

from modelina.

This would be a breaking change, right?

Any idea where to start? I imagined this to be an easy change but grepping for anonymous yields only CommonModel and AsyncAPIInputProcessor apart from the tests / examples. It's not apparent to me where AnonymousSchema_N gets generated.

from modelina.

What annotation would that be?

You would have to explicitly define the message payload as the name of the message.

This would be a breaking change, right?

Yes, just target the next branch 🙂 Unless you want to hide it behind an option.

Any idea where to start? I imagined this to be an easy change but grepping for anonymous yields only CommonModel and AsyncAPIInputProcessor apart from the tests / examples. It's not apparent to me where AnonymousSchema_N gets generated.

All this logic happens in the input processor for AsyncAPI:

from modelina.