Support for .NET 2.0 about autofac HOT 10 CLOSED

From [email protected] on February 04, 2008 18:00:17

Will provide an additional build configuration utilising LinqBridge.dll.

Thanks for your input, Joseph.

Status: Accepted
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-High Milestone-Patch

from autofac.

From alex.meyergleaves on February 05, 2008 02:33:03

That sounds great Nicholas. It's hard to get customers to keep their framework
version up-to-date and I would hate to see developers missing out on some sweet IoC
action because of it. ;)

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 05, 2008 03:08:25

Status: Started

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 05, 2008 06:07:57

I've attached a 'demo' version targeting 2.0 and LinqBridge. I haven't yet configured
the unit tests in the build script so I'm not going to call this closed yet, however
the results look good so far :)

Please let me know how this works for you. If no one finds any surprises, expect an
'official' version in a week or so.

Cheers,

Nick

Attachment: autofac-dotnet2-demo.zip

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 05, 2008 06:11:16

Owner: nicholas.blumhardt

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 05, 2008 19:35:58

Works well in .NET 2.0.

I started a thread in the autofac group called "Using Autofac in .NET 2.0" about
registering services in .NET 2.0

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 06, 2008 01:03:52

.NET 2/LinqBridge version is now available from the download page.

Status: Verified

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 11, 2008 21:03:53

Have downloaded the .NET 2/LinqBridge version.

The demo version (above) needed to reference the LinqBridge.dll but the autofac-
dotnet2-1.0.8.190.zip file includes the LinqBridge but when it is used, nothing
seems to require it.

Did you merge the LinqBridge version into the autofac.dll?

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 11, 2008 21:33:05

Hi Joseph,

No, the LinqBridge.dll remains separate - perhaps check that you're using
Autofac.DotNet2.dll rather than Autofac.dll?

Failing that, please let me know what you see under the 'references' list in Reflector.

Cheers,

Nick

from autofac.

From [email protected] on February 13, 2008 14:43:21

Interesting... it must depend on what functionality is used. For the parts we are
using the assembly will build and run without LinqBridge.dll.

from autofac.