Remaining amount should be transferred back to the msg.sender instead to the first receiver. about eth-splitter HOT 2 CLOSED

Original thought is that since dust is relatively immaterial could be sent to one of the recipients. If it's sent back to the sender, it's an additional eth transfer (there is an argument to avoid additional gas on a little bit of dust). It is cheaper to just adjust the amount of one of the recipients.

from eth-splitter.

My thought was in context it didn't seem out of place or completely wrong I was okay in terms of the current way but def we can return the remaining to the funder too check with @Avelous on tg

from eth-splitter.