Comments (12)
Ok, i will see, if i can replace the configobj by JSON object. i will see with the author's merged code
from gitcheck.
Thanks, configobj
is not part of a standard python install, thus makes your script a bit incompatible.
from gitcheck.
I have fixed temporary the problem. Sorry for the inconvenience.
from gitcheck.
thanks, this fixed the problem, but when I run your script, I see these useless messages:
Beginning scan... building list of git folders
Done
Can these be removed or put under a debug flag? Non-essential output on the terminal should only be displayed for debugging. Don't you think?
from gitcheck.
Grrr i don"t understand the issue is closed (i think the comment ! :).
For you bug, i don"t understand, i have tested before commit and it's work
for me (Linux).
Can you send me more informations ?
BA
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Helmut Tessarek [email protected]
wrote:
thanks, this fixed the problem, but when I run your script, I see these
useless messages:Beginning scan... building list of git folders
DoneCan these be removed or put under a debug flag? Non-essential output on
the terminal should only be displayed for debugging. Don't you think?—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12 (comment).
Bruno Adele
[email protected]
Perso: jesuislibre http://www.jesuislibre.org | blog
http://blog.jesuislibre.org | twitter http://twitter.com/jesuislibre |
flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/b_adele
Pro: cendreo http://www.cendreo.com | blog http://blog.jesuislibre.org
Site : informemoi.com
from gitcheck.
No, no. Everything is fine. No worries. I was just talking about a cosmetic issue, not a functional problem.
I'll close this issue and open another one (later tonight), where I can explain it in more detail.
from gitcheck.
Ok, now i understand your problem ! :) You do not have a problem :)
Since last merged code, you think the gitcheck is too verbose! Is that correct ?
from gitcheck.
Yes, that's correct. If I run it, I only want to see the result or the output shown with -v.
The output I pasted earlier seems more like a debug message. It has no information with regards to the git status, which is the main reason for your script.
I'm sure most people rather read important information than debug output. What's your opinion on that?
If you are ok with it, I can create a --debug
option...
from gitcheck.
Ok, no problem, i will add a --debug feature
from gitcheck.
Thank you.
Your script is really useful and I'm using it almost daily. Most of the time debug messages just distract you from the real information. I'm not saying debug info is not important (I'm using debug messages quite a lot), but it shouldn't be shown by default.
from gitcheck.
In the pull request I just made (#13), I
- Replaced configObj by a simple JSON file
- removed the debug message (actually I just commented them using #DEBUG so we can re-use them later in a future -debug option).
I kept messages when sending email so the user know where the result file has been saved and that email is sent to whom...
from gitcheck.
Awesome. Your change to send emails is very useful. Especially, if you want to run it in the background on a server. The messages when sending emails are also very useful. I usually redirect the output to a file when I run the script in the background. Great change!
from gitcheck.
Related Issues (18)
- Add support for running within a single git repository HOT 4
- Alphabetize repository listing
- Only shows develop branches on Ubuntu 14.04 HOT 5
- Serious unicode issue on Python 2.7 with subprocess.popen HOT 1
- Doesn't show if local needs to pull HOT 1
- Colors... HOT 7
- Multiple dirs HOT 2
- gitcheck installation with pip doesn't install 'colored' automatically HOT 2
- Quiet option incorrectly asks for an argument
- Look for stashed changes HOT 2
- text file as configuration
- modified terminal colors persist after calling gitcheck
- upload distribution to PyPI?
- Thoughts about --auto-pull --auto-push flags? HOT 5
- Gitcheck does not show remote without passing the -r option
- Dependency Missing - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'colored' HOT 1
- Readme is not very clear, and I had the greatest trouble installing it HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from gitcheck.