specs2 support about rules_scala HOT 4 CLOSED

Well, we can leave it closed if you have a work around (at least give us
the impression the issue count is not too high. ;)

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Ittai Zeidman [email protected]
wrote:

No worries at all, hope you enjoyed the getaway and congratulations :)
Do you want me to reopen the issue?
Like I said I don't need this currently but others might. I might even get
around to it later on but now I'm trying to face my blockers.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#72 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAEJdqtXa1OPSqbmpSYFc42GipdO2j0Kks5qLjingaJpZM4Ivzaq
.

P. Oscar Boykin, Ph.D. | http://twitter.com/posco | http://pobox.com/~boykin

from rules_scala.

I'm actually closing this one since we actually use the JUnit runner to run our specs2 tests (SpecificationWithJUnit) and so I'll just solve it locally with compiling using the mix_java_scala and then running a JUnit runner ( in sh_test?)

from rules_scala.

Sorry I didn't reply sooner. I think a scala_specs_test could be fine to
add. I don't see a good way to do it in one rule.

I don't think you need the scalatest dependency if you don't use the rule.

On Monday, June 13, 2016, Ittai Zeidman [email protected] wrote:

Closed #72 #72.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#72 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAEJdkLvZPJ3jc7sV1eQSTlNYnl2y3zCks5qLjKXgaJpZM4Ivzaq
.

P. Oscar Boykin, Ph.D. | http://twitter.com/posco | http://pobox.com/~boykin

from rules_scala.

No worries at all, hope you enjoyed the getaway and congratulations :)
Do you want me to reopen the issue?
Like I said I don't need this currently but others might. I might even get around to it later on but now I'm trying to face my blockers.

from rules_scala.