Timeline about bionode-watermill HOT 3 CLOSED

Good, but I think that:

• "implement methods from papers with great use cases for streaming"
• "example workflow that exemplifies mixing node transform/filter streams and data analysis"

need to be much higher (like week 6) since:

• these are what actually showcase the benefits of the project compared to other existing solutions
• convinces people to use bionode
• allow feedback from users
• help drive development towards tasks with maximal benefit

Otherwise, it might be very easy to get distracted implementing features that sound nice but might not have a clear and immediate benefit to people. Also, the web/electron GUI is an ambitious project in itself, and so we shouldn't dedicate time to it until we have a solid and useful CLI solution, which probably won't happen before the end of GSoC since we only have 8 weeks left.

I believe @yannickwurm shares a similar view on this.

from bionode-watermill.

Edited the timeline. If you guys can pick out a few papers that have good methods that we can reproduce with waterwheel, that would be great. Having a workflow goal to implement really helps determine a goal and discover edge/use cases. I'm thinking something that takes a stream of SRA accessions (and can then distribute those emitted values over SGE/cluster). I'd like to play with RNAseq a bit too, maybe use Kallisto.

from bionode-watermill.

Some of this can be recycled for next GSoC, but I'm closing it since the 2016 one is over.
Here's a summary of what was achieved and what's next:
https://github.com/bionode/gsoc16/blob/master/README.md

from bionode-watermill.