Creating control along with attribute about xrm-mock HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi @Kraviecc. Yes, the generator should be very opinionated and default as many values as possible to closely mimic Xrm’s true implementation. Controls should be created when an Attribute is created.

from xrm-mock.

I've fixed the issue with not being able to create the control from the Xrm-Mock-Generator already, just haven't published it (actually, I'm not sure how or when to publish it).

I'm working on this issue today.

from xrm-mock.

And as far as defaulting controls, I'm planning on having the Generator not require anything besides the type which is determined by the function name string/number/lookup, etc, and the name of the attribute/control.

from xrm-mock.

This should be done now for all attribute types.

from xrm-mock.