Some improvements of LRFinder about catalyst HOT 7 CLOSED

Hi,

I am not sure about 10, but something like 1.0 will be okay.
Nevertheless, it depends, so for best approach you can checkout original paper (I think so) - A disciplined approach to neural network hyper-parameters: Part 1--learning rate, batch size, momentum, and weight decay

from catalyst.

1. After checking Smith's reports I'm not sure about necessity default value. Moreover, after running some tests on my problem I observed expected convergence-divergence but then convergence again with large lr > 1. Such insights will be missed if I use default value. And, probably, it would be better if user would ask himself about final_lr.

2. However, implementing 'terminating on nan' as a standalone callback, outside LRFinder, seems to be better option since it reusability. Such callback would be like a 'early stopping', which, in general, may occurs when overfitting detected, etc. I think, it must be taken into consideration for better code structure.

3. Also I see, doc for LRFinder mentions 'log' and 'linear' options, however these are not realized yet.

4. And what about tests? I don't see examples to follow in catalyst, except test_main.py. How should be they organized?

5. And one more thing. It is more convenient to look at (learning_rate - loss) plot, not to separate lr and loss. But the only way I see to realize it is generate such plot inside LRFinder and translate it to tensorboard or to file.

6. Probably it is worth to add some usage examples for LRFinder.

from catalyst.

So, speaking about LRFinder and 'log' and 'linear' options (as I understand final_lr is okay for everyone). There was some experiments with difference lr scheduling options, but in the end log one was found most appropriate to find optimal LR.
Nevertheless, different LRFinder options or (learning_rate - loss) plot contribution is always welcome.
Except (learning_rate - loss) plot implementation should look something like make_report script to make it really simple and reusable.

'terminating on nan' or as we call it DebugCallback/ExceptionHandler - is really good idea and it must be done soon. The main problem here is that it can't be done like a callback, because it need to wrap all of them and handle their exceptions. One possible solution for ExceptionHandler implementation is another method in Runner and wrap all callbacks with it. Nevertheless, I am still looking for more flexible solution.

And finally, tests, the most tricky part :)
Currently we are using only integration tests during PR. All other tests and their structure are WIP now, and will be the main goal for 19.02 release.

from catalyst.

After some investigation I see that the only way to get (lr-loss) plot is parse logs.txt, isn't it? The easiest way, of course, just use regular expressions in script. But if the log format changes, it will stop working. logging module doesn't provide any parsing method, moreover message has custom format. However, parsing logs may be required in some other places in perspective. May be, it is worth to add static method for parsing directly in Logger callback?

from catalyst.

So, I think you can modify LoggerCallback to write all metrics in some logs.json also. It should be quite easy, because all batch metrics are dicts.

PS. btw, speaking about the reports I still hope to implement the idea from Scitator/catalyst-examples#1 (comment), because this grid search plots are amazing.

from catalyst.

Hi!
Turning back to (learning rate - loss) plot, where it would be better to place script? contrib/sctipts? Or, may be, dl/scripts, as it provide basic functionality?

from catalyst.

Hi,

Speaking about LrFinder and LR-metric plot, dl-scripts are the best place to use. At least, if you don't need some heave libs like tensorflow or nmslib (current contrib ones).

from catalyst.