Key terms that are also definitions do not have the proper markup about regulations-site HOT 4 CLOSED

Actually, all of the 1005.2 terms are not identified as a key terms in the
source XML that we use. So, this is not a bug.

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Adam Scott [email protected] wrote:

Key terms that are also definitions do not currently receive the key term
markup. For examples, see all of 1005.2 or 1005.3 b.

In the case of 1005.3 b, it should be marked up as follows:

Electronic fund transfer

In the long-term, I think it would make the most sense not to exclude the
definition link as well (but that may need to be part of a larger
discussion):

Electronic
fund transfer.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/eregs/regulations-site/issues/72
.

Shashank G. Khandelwal
http://skhandelwal.com

Travel Planning Made Easier
http://twyga.com

from regulations-site.

@cmc333333 Any thoughts?

from regulations-site.

1005.2 doesn't have any keyterms -- each paragraph begins with a sentence.

1005.3 b has this markup:

<dfn class="key-term" dfn-key-term="Electronic fund transfer"><a href="#1005-2-g" class="citation definition" data-definition="1005-2-g">Electronic fund transfer</a>.</dfn>

Is the problem that "Electronic fund transfer" should be slugized: "electronic-fund-transfer" or is something else missing?

from regulations-site.

The markup for 1005.3 b is correct. I must have been looking at an outdated version of the reg.

In the mockups, the defined terms within 1005.2 are given a different visual treatment, but the text doesn't fit the "key-term" structure. I'll close this and follow up in regards to design. Thanks!

from regulations-site.