Can you use a license thats clearer or made for software about 92five HOT 4 CLOSED

On second thought, I might be wrong about second point (changing logo), because the common case is it's self-hosted and as long as the adapted work is not "shared" it should be valid.

from 92five.

MIT should be fine for this type of project.

from 92five.

@eliasak and @dvdpearson Sorry for late reply guys.I looked into the current licensing options available and will figure out something soon.

By creating PR one doesn't breaks the license since I am aware of the change made. But soon will figure out something to fit the needs of the applicaton.

Thanks

from 92five.

There's lots of choices. MIT license is on the open side, on the other more restrictive side is the AGPL. Something towards the middle that might serve your and community's needs might be: GPL + commercial alternative (similar to what MySql used to do).

from 92five.