License information is missing about csl-validator HOT 7 CLOSED

Uhm, yeah, I'm rather sloppy when keeping track of code licenses.

For the libraries I use:

Ladda (and Spin): https://github.com/hakimel/Ladda/blob/master/LICENSE (MIT license)
Qurl: https://github.com/ryanburnette/Qurl/blob/master/LICENSE (Apache 2.0)

As for my own code, I'm fine with any permissive license. Maybe MIT makes the most sense (http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/)? @adam3smith, any thoughts?

from csl-validator.

Sorry, I have nothing. I always default to (A)GPL, but for anything CSL I think something more permissive for closed-sourcing makes sense.

from csl-validator.

@dstillman, @cpina, @cparnot, do you have any suggestions for a suitable software license? I would prefer to standardize on a single license for all CSL software, if possible.

This might also be a good occasion to decide on a license for everything in https://github.com/citation-style-language/utilities and at https://github.com/citation-style-language/distribution-updater. AGPL?

from csl-validator.

I’d like to avoid a “viral” license for any of the stuff I contributed. I’d rather go with MIT or BSD.

On Jan 4, 2015, at 5:53 PM, Rintze M. Zelle [email protected] wrote:

@dstillman, @cpina, @cparnot, do you have any suggestions for a suitable software license? I would prefer to standardize on a single license for all CSL software, if possible.

This might also be a good occasion to decide on a license for everything in https://github.com/citation-style-language/utilities and at https://github.com/citation-style-language/distribution-updater. AGPL?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Charles Parnot
[email protected]
http://app.net/cparnot
twitter: @cparnot

Your Lab Notebook, Reinvented.
http://findingsapp.com

from csl-validator.

Like @cparnot : MIT or BSD are the most convenient here.

from csl-validator.

Cool. In that case I'll go with the MIT license.

@dstillman, is this license okay for https://github.com/citation-style-language/distribution-updater, or do you prefer AGPL?

from csl-validator.

@dstillman, is this license okay for https://github.com/citation-style-language/distribution-updater

Yes, that's fine.

from csl-validator.