U+27627 𧘧 about cjkvi-ids HOT 2 OPEN

I'm considering how to handle this case, as "𧘧" and "𧘞" has the same mening, but differnent pronunciation. Perhaps you may have some very convincing evidences, but I wanted to try to assign the IDS which is not presented in the actual UCS standards.

I will decline your proposal for now. BTW, I found that very early UCS draft has some "inflection" on vertical stroke of "𧘧"

from cjkvi-ids.

The information on 𧘧 in Kangxi is very short -- it quotes 字彙補 which only has a pronunciation and meaning but not quote of text which uses it. 字彙補 is known for collecting characters of obscure origin that can hardly be verified.

According to the glyphwiki itaiji listing, "𧘧" and "𧘞" are listed as itaiji under [漢語俗字叢考] & [疑難字續考], which is compiled by 張湧泉 and 楊寶忠 which are well respected experts in ancient Hanzi. I do not have those books so I cannot check, but I will suppose that "𧘧" has been identified as a corruption of "𧘞" (and not the other way round).

from cjkvi-ids.