Understanding decision merge about liberator HOT 3 CLOSED

This is one of the points that must be worked out in more detail before I want to release a 1.0. The current behavior is often the desired one, but you cannot remove an existing key. In any case the behavior and the motivation behind it must be documented.

from liberator.

My suggestion is to rename it 'combine'. Since that name doesn't clash with
anything in clojure.core it will avoid confusion with clojure.core/merge
and clojure.core/merge-with

On 10 October 2012 08:20, Philipp Meier [email protected] wrote:

This is one of the points that must be worked out in more detail before I
want to release a 1.0. The current behavior is often the desired one, but
you cannot remove an existing key. In any case the behavior and the
motivation behind it must be documented.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/11#issuecomment-9292298.

from liberator.

Renaming to 'combine' sounds reasonable.

from liberator.