Put support about hdfs HOT 8 CLOSED

Yup - that's absolutely in the works. I just haven't sat down to implement the protocol yet (it's fairly involved) =)

I'll keep this issue open until I do. Thanks for the poke!

from hdfs.

very interested in this as well, I appreciate the work.

from hdfs.

@mindscratch thanks for the bump =) If you're interested on living on the edge, I think the tests are passing in the PR I referenced above (#12). It doesn't support failing over if a datanode dies, though.

from hdfs.

Hey, are you progressing on write supports? I am taking a HDFS-based distributed computing framework in golang, so i am eager to using your writing function instead of webREST interfaces.
BTW, the write-support branch is valid or not? Can i use it for my project?

from hdfs.

Hey Andrew,

I Haven't made any progress recently, but if you check out the linked
branch the interfaces are there, and they work. The missing bits are
failover and comprehensive testing, but you could still develop against the
branch.

Sorry about the trouble!

On Tue, May 26, 2015, 17:34 Andrew Lee [email protected] wrote:

Hey, are you progressing on write supports? I am taking a HDFS-based
distributed computing framework in golang, so i am eager to using your
writing function instead of webREST interfaces.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#5 (comment).

from hdfs.

Hey @colinmarc,

Thanks for the library and cli tools! It feels blazingly fast compared to using the standard hdfs cli or loading a jvm in general :)

I see you wrote put support and I would like to use it. Since there is no support for datanode failover, what happens when a node does fail? Is there any kind of panic/error returned or do we currently just keep going like nothing happened?

Cheers,
-Tim

from hdfs.

@imoverclocked If the test failures are any indication, I think you'll get some (byzantine) errors. Hopefully not a panic.

from hdfs.

Closed in #12

from hdfs.