Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (6)

jcponce avatar jcponce commented on July 17, 2024

Thanks. I will check it as soon as possible. :)

from complex-analysis.github.io.

jcponce avatar jcponce commented on July 17, 2024

Hi there,

After a closer inspection, there is a missing point in my definition. The value of R cannot be taken arbitrarily. This value must depend on the value we have chosen for M. Otherwise we have the issue you mentioned.

The same applies to the other definitions.

I think I will add that extra information in the definitions to clarify it.

What do you think?

Update: I actually have a mistake. It should be R > max(0,ln M). I will fix it.

from complex-analysis.github.io.

WilsonSawyer avatar WilsonSawyer commented on July 17, 2024

Thank you for responding. I'm a novice (if superannuated) at this, so I may still be misinterpreting something. But I don't think that spelling out the constraints on R fixes the problem. I think your existing M,R rules successfully give rigor to the informal notion of a limit that "as |z| rushes off to infinity (along any path), then |f(z)| must also." But if the path is parallel to the imaginary axis, then |e^z| will be the fixed value e^x, never increasing.

To ask the same question a different way: What is special about the zero in D_1 = {z: Re(z) = 0 }? That is, suppose I pose domain D_3 = { z: Re(z) = 3 }? The limit for my D_3 as z -> infinity is now e^3. Doesn't that contradict D_3's inclusion in domain D? If I wished, I could also "slide" your "D" and D_2 domains over to use Re(z) > 3, Re(z) < 3, and have the same properties for those domains as your originals.

from complex-analysis.github.io.

jcponce avatar jcponce commented on July 17, 2024

Hi Wilson,

Thanks for your detailed explanation. I see better what is the issue with my example. I did not consider the case for a path parallel to the imaginary axis, since I missed the point that exp(z) is periodic.

To avoid that issue in my example I need to add an extra restriction to the domain, e.g., considering |Im(z)|< delta < pi/2.

What do you think?

Update: Changed my inequality.

from complex-analysis.github.io.

WilsonSawyer avatar WilsonSawyer commented on July 17, 2024

from complex-analysis.github.io.

jcponce avatar jcponce commented on July 17, 2024

Hi,

I think I will change the example.

Thanks again for the feedback.

Happy holidays. :)

from complex-analysis.github.io.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.