Average Directional Index seems to be slightly off about stock.indicators HOT 5 CLOSED

I’ll take a look. Are you able to confirm that the historical quote data used in both is the same? Some providers will adjust differently for splits and dividends, which would produce slightly different results. Also, make sure you are providing at least 250 points of quote history prior to the measured date in the GetAdx call. In your example, your history should start before January 2000. This algorithm uses a convergence method that increases in precision when more history is provided; if you only provided the minimum required history before that evaluation date, precision will be off a bit.

from stock.indicators.

I did find a minor bug with the initialization value that only had small precision impacts on the initialization period values. This bug did not impact the accuracy of values after the initialization period. I also increased the minimum required history from 2×N+1 to 2×N+150 to ensure users are aware of the initialization period where values are less precise and that this indicator needs more runway. Thank you for reporting.

from stock.indicators.

This fix was implemented in v1.1.1

from stock.indicators.

from stock.indicators.

This Issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new Issue for related bugs.

from stock.indicators.