please clarify move to GPL about deck-of-cards HOT 5 CLOSED

I will change to LGPL and after I've moved graphics to another repo, I can change back to MIT. Sorry I don't know that much about licenses, I just read from somewhere that if a dependency is GPL, you should also use GPL. Thank you so much for bringing this out! ;)

from deck-of-cards.

thanks! 😌

from deck-of-cards.

I learn something today, thanks @amitport

I was used to choose GPL but I realize it's a bit strong :) I think LGPL is a good compromise

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Lesser_General_Public_License

from deck-of-cards.

I don't understand any of that, but will change back to MIT as soon as theming is ready and the default theme moved away. If you use Deck of Cards (only dist/deck.min.js) without Chris's vector graphics, it's MIT - you can refer to here.

But I hope you still show me what you've done - it's interesting to see what people come up with :) And a little credit is always due ;)

from deck-of-cards.

I updated readme and license to clarify it's MIT without Chris Aguilar's vector playing cards graphic set.

from deck-of-cards.