UndefinedClassesOrProperty metric implementation might not be entirely correct about quality HOT 4 OPEN

BTW, @jerdeb, @nfriesen, does this issue (as well as #30) belong to a milestone, or is it something we should not prioritise before the July D3.2/D5.2 deadlines?

from quality.

If we have it then it is good, but afaik it is not needed for the EBI use
case.

On 23 June 2014 13:36, Christoph Lange [email protected] wrote:

BTW, @jerdeb https://github.com/jerdeb, @nfriesen
https://github.com/nfriesen, does this issue (as well as #30
#30) belong to a milestone,
or is it something we should not prioritise before the July D3.2/D5.2
deadlines?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31 (comment).

from quality.

@jerdeb: let's prioritise as follows: as we have most of the metric already, let Ali fix the remaining (small) problems. I will (hopefully today) clean up the comment above and give Ali some concrete instructions in #30.

from quality.

@jerdeb in #30 I gave the final “set” of instructions for “fixing this metric in its current state”. I have a few more ideas for further improving it, which I wrote down as a separate, low-priority issue in #43. However could you please once more review the original description of this issue? Just to make sure we have the right understanding of this metric.

from quality.