Don't include all of gitlab.adullact.net about politique-de-contribution-open-source HOT 6 CLOSED

LGTM

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.

@bzg Gitlab.adullact.net is dedicated to local governments software. Do you have example of "non-gov" software? Had you ever found some exceptions, I think they should not change your default policy :)

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.

Hi @mfaure and thanks for your feedback. The primary intent of code.etalab.gouv.fr is to list source code published by the public sector, not made for or related/dedicated to the public sector - that's why comptes-organismes-publics is named that way.

For example, it is fine to reference prodigeadmin because, by reading the description, I assume it is handled by the CEREMA, which is public sector. But pixelhumain or Libriciel are not handled by a public administration, they are respectively handled by an association (or a community?) and a company.

Is this criterium clear and "actionable" enough for you?

Could you help us sort out GitLab projects owned by an administration (i.e. where the admin of the project is from the public sector) from projects owned by a company or an (informal) association?

Thanks again for your help, clarity is very important here.

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.

Thanks @bzg for the explanations. Feel free to ping us if you need help

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.

Ping :)

We need help identifying what GitLab projects are administrated by public organizations on https://gitlab.adullact.net

I suspect this is not straightforward and requires quite some time on your side... So I suggest that you first help us identifying the 10 most important projects for now, then add them in comptes-organismes-publics and remove the gitlab.adullact.net there.

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.

Hi @mfaure, I plan to publicly advertize the existence of https://code.etalab.gouv.fr on wednesday Oct. 2dn on Etalab's blog.

I think the safe way to deal with this issue is to remove gitlab.adullact.net from comptes-organismes-publics for now, then add specific projects progressively.

Are you okay with this approach?

I'd rather add links to repos than delete them: there is less to explain to our users.

from politique-de-contribution-open-source.