CosmosResponse to interface about cosmonaut HOT 3 CLOSED

Hello @MatsJakobsson and thanks for opening this.

Up until 2.5.0 the constructor for CosmosResponse was public and I accidentally set it back to internal.
The idea was that if people wanted to wrap their CosmosDB responses with this single response object, they should be able to. I don't know how this will be in 3.0 but for now I am changing back to public as it would be a breaking change.

This should allow you to to create the object on your Mocking framework's Returns method. Does that sound ok?

from cosmonaut.

Wow! You are fast! :)

Sounds great! An interface would be even more flexible, but a public constructor would simplify a lot.

Thanks!

from cosmonaut.

Public constructors added back in 2.6.2. Feel free to upgrade. Don’t forget to read the response handling sector of the readme page.

Yeah I think I’ll have to rethink some appoaches in 3.0, this one included. The end goal would be an interface but I can’t massively change interfaces without a major release atm.

Thanks for raising this issue and thanks for using Cosmonaut.
Closing this for now. Feel free to open a new issue if you find some problem.

from cosmonaut.