Typing autocomplete for Model Records about denodb HOT 1 CLOSED

Hello,

Good question, I actually already tried to work on this. The only way to get intellisense as of right now is to add the following in your case:

class Flight extends Model {
  // ...after static methods
  departure!: string;
  destination!: string;
  // ...and so on
}

I am not a huge fan of this syntax. I thought of switching to decorators which would solve the issue but this might push people away from the simplicity of denodb.

I might make this up to the dev, to choose between decorators or static fields.

So anyways, here you have it :)

Thanks for asking and do not hesitate if anything else comes to your mind!

from denodb.