why don't use uuid module instead of uid2? about session HOT 9 CLOSED

With the next version of the library, feel free to do this yourself with the genid option:

app.use(session({
  genid: function(){ return uuid.v4() }
}))

from session.

This patch seems work fine:

diff --git a/index.js b/index.js
index d48bcd1..9cae893 100644
--- a/index.js
+++ b/index.js
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
  * Module dependencies.
  */

-var uid = require('uid2')
+var uuid = require('node-uuid')
   , onHeaders = require('on-headers')
   , crc32 = require('buffer-crc32')
   , parse = require('url').parse
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ function session(options){

   // generates the new session
   store.generate = function(req){
-    req.sessionID = uid(24);
+    req.sessionID = uuid.v4();
     req.session = new Session(req);
     req.session.cookie = new Cookie(cookie);
   };
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json
index df44c60..198f1b1 100644
--- a/package.json
+++ b/package.json
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
     "cookie-signature": "1.0.3",
     "debug": "1.0.2",
     "on-headers": "0.0.0",
-    "uid2": "0.0.3",
+    "uuid": "*",
     "utils-merge": "1.0.0"
   },
   "devDependencies": {

from session.

Why does this matter?

from session.

I don't think it does. Plus there is no RFC for how to store session IDs in cookies.

from session.

In debian we have node-uuid, it's used by other 880 modules (uid2 by only 45) according with npm.
We consider it as a better implementation, I would suggest you to use it. That's all.

from session.

There are 880 modules that generate sessions with node-uuid? I think those numbers are not actually useful here. If we created a module that generated super awesome secure and fully random values and it was only used by this module, then your numbers argument would say it is inferior simply because it's only used by 1 module.

We can replace it. Can you provide us an actual reason why to replace it? So far you have not really provided a reason, and without a good maintainer for this module, we don't want to really just willy-nilly change stuff.

from session.

@dougwilson But there is an RFC on uid's http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt

uid2 has no repository and no tests, so I'm not exactly in favor with it although it is quite simple and does the job.

from session.

@Fishrock123 the original reasoning on using UUID was it is "and more RFC compliance", but how it is more RFC compliance than using uid? I know there is a RFC for what a UUID is, but that doesn't related to using it for session IDs, which is my point.

from session.

Going to just close. Reopen if there's a valid reason unless someone wants to maintain this

from session.