Call-graph ramifications of the FORD type-bound procedures public/private policy about ford HOT 2 CLOSED

@ZedThree
A further wrinkle in this issue is when there is a binding name (i.e. sub in this case) added to the type-bound procedure from the above orginal code example:

  type a_module_t
    private
    integer :: a_module_t_int
  contains
    procedure :: sub => a_module_t_sub
  end type a_module_t

along with a main program call to the binding name

call a_module_t_obj%sub("There")

Regardless if there is a public :: a_module_t_sub statement and there is no module-level private statement, this call does not appear in the program's call-graph (the call-graph is not even generated in this case because it's the only procedure call).

from ford.

This is at least partially fixed in #539. "Called-by" graphs are not yet generated for type-bound procedures, I will look into fixing that when I have time.

from ford.