private derived type documentation missing about ford HOT 4 CLOSED

Yes, that is the reason why no documentation was created for Type_Command_Line_Argument. I hadn't anticipated that there would be a variable with a private derived type which is publicly accessible. I don't particularly want to change FORD's behaviour by making documentation for a private type and it would be difficult to over-ride it in a specific case like this one. I think I'll just add some logic to remove the hyperlink. If that is unsatisfactory then I can perhaps increase the priority of adding the ability to be able to force something to be documented even if it private.

from ford.

Hi Chris,

thank you very much for work!

I do not like to impose my preference. I like to document everything, but it is not a priority. I think that you should follow your preferences...

from ford.

Well, if you'd like to document everything, then just add the following
lines to the meta-data in your project file:

display: public
          protected
          private

On 07/01/15 10:59 AM, Stefano Zaghi wrote:

Hi Chris,

thank you very much for work!

I do not like to impose my preference. I like to document everything,
but it is not a priority. I think that you should follow your
preferences...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/cmacmackin/ford/issues/6#issuecomment-69032725.

Chris MacMackin
Saint Mary's University
Curriculum Vitae http://ap.smu.ca/%7Ecmacmack/CV.pdf

from ford.

Great! It is not clear into the main doc...
Can I contribute to your great tool by means of the wiki? It found that wiki is a great help...

from ford.