Unreproducable: accuracy for porn class in nsfw_data_scrapper dataset about nsfw_model HOT 7 OPEN

I haven't had such poor results. How clean/sure are you of your data?

Also which model did you use? Keras or TF?

I do not have such poor results on my machine, so I'm trying to gather the details.

from nsfw_model.

I used this keras model https://s3.amazonaws.com/nsfwdetector/nsfw.299x299.h5. I basically ran the scripts in https://github.com/alexkimxyz/nsfw_data_scraper to generate the train dataset, and used the train dataset to test it. There are 106153 porn images tested with the model. What's your suggestions around this test? Thanks

from nsfw_model.

Wow. That result sucks! It sounds like I need to re-run the scraper and get some more data and see if I can retrain the model. It's doing amazing with my local dataset. Which was pulled not long ago.

Feel free to see if training on your dataset improves performance.

from nsfw_model.

@GantMan thanks, I will try to do it when I have time. Meanwhile, if you had chance to re-train, please let me know. Thanks

from nsfw_model.

Also, if you run the "self clense" script can you let me know if you have a lot of errors in your dataset?

Mine was pretty clean. From what I recall, a fresh pull on NSFW data scraper can be pretty off.

from nsfw_model.

@TechnikEmpire what's the advantage of SSD for this simple classification?

from nsfw_model.

Hrmmm. That came off kinda harsh. This project is about everything and everyone. Would you like to try again? I think this is a great chance for you to practice sharing your research in a friendly yet challenging way.

from nsfw_model.