RFC: License about gbadoc HOT 7 CLOSED

I see no particular reason not to publish it in the public domain (or any other license that will ensure the information stays freely accessible forever)

from gbadoc.

CC0 seems simplest for documentation to use.

from gbadoc.

CC0 is pretty much a way to formalize public domain, so yeah, it's probably better.

from gbadoc.

Yeah. And, for those who aren't aware: not all jurisdictions actually recognize the concept of public domain, so CC0 (which has a fallback clause for such jurisdictions) is better than a simple public domain statement.

from gbadoc.

Yeah. And, for those who aren't aware: not all jurisdictions actually recognize the concept of public domain, so CC0 (which has a fallback clause for such jurisdictions) is better than a simple public domain statement.

I didn't know about this, that's good to know!

from gbadoc.

I agree with @LunarLambda, it could also be nice to have the license guarantee that we're credited as the original authors if the assets are ever forked and whatnot

from gbadoc.

Great. Let's go with CC0.

from gbadoc.