Check each generated model with Arachne about gocamgen HOT 8 OPEN

Oh this is awesome @goodb thanks! This "has_input on GP" was just pointed out to me by @vanaukenk in #39. Will fix right away.

from gocamgen.

part of #6

from gocamgen.

This isn't really a development task. Can use command-line tools to do it or one-off. Will work on it once we have a real attempt at the conversion to test.

from gocamgen.

I have this running now locally. Testing on some MGI files most look good. This one is inconsistent:
http://noctua-dev.berkeleybop.org/editor/graph/gomodel:72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181

for MGI:MGI:1923628

I believe this is happening because a gene can't have a has_input relation attached to it.

Explanation trace isn't showing up for me in noctua-dev but I can generate locally. It is:

http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/997ffc8e-e480-447f-955a-b0666f0f17d5
inferred inconsistent:http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/997ffc8e-e480-447f-955a-b0666f0f17d5 null

Facts:
(http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/997ffc8e-e480-447f-955a-b0666f0f17d5 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002264 http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/20bee95e-3ead-428d-8e84-b0dd0678a7c6)

(http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/997ffc8e-e480-447f-955a-b0666f0f17d5 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002233 http://model.geneontology.org/72c613ee-0fa8-4883-b511-acfa8d70f181/4bdd563c-4a4e-4924-94a7-0226b28e1b7a)

Rules:
[ (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000015) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000003) ]
[ (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000004) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000002) ]
[ (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000040) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000004) ]
[ (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002500 ?x2) -> (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002595 ?x2) ]
[ (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002264 ?x2) -> (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002500 ?x2) ]
[ (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002595 ?x2) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000040) ]
[ (?x1 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002233 ?x2) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000015) ]
[ (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000002) ^ (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000003) -> (?x1 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Nothing) ]

from gocamgen.

@dustine32 here are a few more (non-exhaustive) MGI models with inconsistencies

MGI_MGI_1923628.ttl
MGI_MGI_1919238.ttl
MGI_MGI_1919364.ttl
MGI_MGI_99878.ttl
MGI_MGI_1098748.ttl
MGI_MGI_2447658.ttl
MGI_MGI_1916524.ttl
MGI_MGI_2654470.ttl
MGI_MGI_1932535.ttl
MGI_MGI_1933366.ttl

from gocamgen.

here is the complete list of invalid models for MGI

MGI_MGI_1923628.ttl
MGI_MGI_1919238.ttl
MGI_MGI_1919364.ttl
MGI_MGI_99878.ttl
MGI_MGI_1098748.ttl
MGI_MGI_2447658.ttl
MGI_MGI_1916524.ttl
MGI_MGI_2654470.ttl
MGI_MGI_1932535.ttl
MGI_MGI_1933366.ttl
MGI_MGI_1920078.ttl
MGI_MGI_2444431.ttl
MGI_MGI_98397.ttl
MGI_MGI_2138446.ttl
MGI_MGI_88256.ttl
MGI_MGI_88281.ttl
MGI_MGI_1917115.ttl
MGI_MGI_3643902.ttl
MGI_MGI_107537.ttl
MGI_MGI_103223.ttl
MGI_MGI_1926334.ttl
MGI_MGI_1922967.ttl
MGI_MGI_88283.ttl
MGI_MGI_1098272.ttl
MGI_MGI_2137670.ttl
MGI_MGI_1859730.ttl
MGI_MGI_88127.ttl
MGI_MGI_98874.ttl
MGI_MGI_88263.ttl
MGI_MGI_97009.ttl
MGI_MGI_98715.ttl
MGI_MGI_1917057.ttl
MGI_MGI_1339949.ttl
MGI_MGI_2684950.ttl
MGI_MGI_1933137.ttl
MGI_MGI_1298204.ttl
MGI_MGI_96067.ttl
MGI_MGI_87963.ttl
MGI_MGI_1202717.ttl
MGI_MGI_2651588.ttl
MGI_MGI_1923733.ttl
MGI_MGI_97583.ttl
MGI_MGI_2676900.ttl
MGI_MGI_2676901.ttl
MGI_MGI_1914940.ttl
MGI_MGI_2682328.ttl
MGI_MGI_98510.ttl
MGI_MGI_105112.ttl
MGI_MGI_2681120.ttl
MGI_MGI_97297.ttl
MGI_MGI_3619045.ttl
MGI_MGI_95668.ttl
MGI_MGI_96573.ttl
MGI_MGI_2384849.ttl
MGI_MGI_97290.ttl
MGI_MGI_1913322.ttl
MGI_MGI_1922670.ttl
MGI_MGI_3582959.ttl
MGI_MGI_3689889.ttl
MGI_MGI_2685008.ttl
MGI_MGI_1915585.ttl

from gocamgen.

And here are all the invalid wormbase models:

WB_WBGene00003102.ttl
WB_WBGene00002637.ttl
WB_WBGene00000443.ttl
WB_WBGene00003167.ttl
WB_WBGene00012348.ttl
WB_WBGene00002990.ttl

from gocamgen.

Just looked at the first few of mine. It seems like they are also the has_input GP issue. Once that bug is fixed, it would be lovely to see this report again.

from gocamgen.