`tatt -o` gives "AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Bugz'" about tatt HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks for you report. Indeed, the pybugz interface changed. However, I'm not using the bugbrowser myself, and I'm thinking of removing it in a future version. Instead of that I use my browser which seems faster and more efficient. The bugbrowser is part of a different approach to arch-testing by Pawel Hajdan. You may look at his tools here: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/arch-tools.git;a=tree
They are described in various blog-posts of his.

from tatt.

Found that pybugz also has a 9999 (live) version. Maybe you should depend on that "version"?

Btw, do you know if gatt is still used? It disappeared from Portage. I've been away from my arch testing duties and getting back to work so I'm catching up with the tools and procedures available right now.

from tatt.

On 03:05 Tue 05 Jun 2012, Vítor Brandão wrote:

Found that pybugz also has a 9999 (live) version. Maybe you should depend on that "version"?

Better not. That may have an even less stable interface.

Btw, do you know if gatt is still used? It disappeared from
Portage. I've been away from my arch testing duties and getting back
to work so I'm catching up with the tools and procedures available
right now.

Development of gatt definitely stopped long ago and I don't know of
anyone using it. The source code may be gotten from the graveyard
somehwere. Fauli is on extended away due to parenthood and I personally
found gatt so hard to understand that I wrote tatt instead. That's all
I know. You may ask the devs that do archtesting what they use. I
don't even know how many people use tatt.

Thomas Kahle

from tatt.

I removed the bugbrowser in a36afbc

from tatt.