Reserved model attribute names about epf HOT 4 OPEN

I can confirm there are some reserved attribute names. Off the top of my head they would be: rev, id, clientId, clientRev, and type.

I will definitely document all of these and will leave this open to address that.

from epf.

I don't want to complain, I think epf is a great library. But it would be neat if type, which is a common attribute, could be moved to _type or similar.

I know Ember Data switched from reference to _reference for the same reason.

from epf.

I'd agree with @sandstrom. This is trivial to workaround by just mapping the attributes on the adapter but I think it will likely trip up a lot of new users. rev and clientRev probably aren't real common, but clientId and especially type are likely to show up quite often. Would there be any issues with just moving these to the underscored versions?

from epf.

I also agree with @sandstrom. Would to use my type properties again.

from epf.