Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (12)

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

The only reference is Coscia et al. (2011) in equation (2):
image

Coscia, I., Greenhalgh, S., Linde, N., Doetsch, J. A., Marescot, L., Günther, T., Vogt, T. & Green, A. (2011): 3D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river water. Geophysics 76(2), G49-G59, doi:10.1190/1.3553003.

from gimli.

tonapawilliam avatar tonapawilliam commented on September 25, 2024

Thank You Sir

from gimli.

makeabhishek avatar makeabhishek commented on September 25, 2024

May I ask, which reference you followed for lambda regularization?

from gimli.

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

Regularization is explained in more detail in the tutorial https://www.pygimli.org/_tutorials_auto/3_inversion/plot_5_Regularization.html

from gimli.

makeabhishek avatar makeabhishek commented on September 25, 2024

Thanks, yes I followed that. Is there any research article specifically explaining the regularization mentioned in the tutorial. Especially the smoothness constraint matrices considered for unstructured mesh.

from gimli.

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

For regularization of , we refer to Günther et al. (2006), the foundation is in more detail explained in Günther (2004) and some other details you can find in Coscia et al. (2011).

Günther, T., Rücker, C. & Spitzer, K. (2006): Three-dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II: Inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 506-517, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03011.x.
Günther, T. (2004): Inversion Methods and Resolution Analysis for the 2D/3D Reconstruction of Resistivity Structures from DC Measurements. PhD thesis, University of Mining and Technology, Freiberg, available on http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:swb:105-4152277.
Coscia, I., Greenhalgh, S., Linde, N., Doetsch, J. A., Marescot, L., Günther, T., Vogt, T. & Green, A. (2011): 3D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river water. Geophysics 76(2), G49-G59, doi:10.1190/1.3553003.

from gimli.

makeabhishek avatar makeabhishek commented on September 25, 2024

What is the recommended approach to choose zWeight in inversion?

from gimli.

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

There is no formal approach. The value expresses the expectation to the subsurface, on how much the resistivity varies in the horizontal and vertical directions. This can be between 1 (or even above in rare cases of vertical structures) and low values like 0.1 or 0.01 for strongly layered structures.

from gimli.

makeabhishek avatar makeabhishek commented on September 25, 2024

What is zWeight in the context of seismic tomography? Just like resistivity range, what could be the possible range in traveltime tomography?

from gimli.

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

The parameter controls the regularization, no matter which parameter is inverted. Wasn't this obvious? Please read the tutorials on regularization.

from gimli.

makeabhishek avatar makeabhishek commented on September 25, 2024

Actually, I was trying to find what values can be given. However, document didn't mention or I didn't find it that it should be in between 0 and 1, not like regularization parameter \lambda. Even while running inversion, giving any value higher than 1 is not throwing any warning or error.
Am I right that zWeight need to be in the range of 0 to 1?

from gimli.

halbmy avatar halbmy commented on September 25, 2024

There is no need to be between 0 and 1. As I explained in my above comment, it can be very reasonably above 1 and of course it can formally also below 0 regarding formula (2) in Coscia et al. (2011). However, if the weight falls below 0, the contribution to the smoothness rises again and there will be a direction with minimum smoothness. So, in fact values below (or even equal to) zero do not make sense although they are possible.

from gimli.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.