Possibly crazy: support for non-SQL datastores? about pop HOT 7 OPEN

You’re not the first to ask. :) The answer is absolutely, provided that someone writes support for it. :) A pr to add support for any of them would be great.

from pop.

Can this be achieved by adding an implementation for the dialect interface?

I guess with NoSQL db's the fizz/translator methods won't need to be implementated.

from pop.

Just my two cents here: Pop is deeply SQL oriented (most of the code handle SQL matters), so in my opinion, introducing NoSQL here is not the best idea. We'll loose most of Pop features. How about having another package for that? :)

from pop.

@stanislas-m : Good point. The new package name could be pop_diet :)

from pop.

Honestly, I'm all for seeing what happens when someone tries to add something like Mongo to it. I'm sure a lot of stuff would be no-ops, but it would be interesting to see. I'm not the person to add it though.

from pop.

sorry - I haven't gotten to this yet. there are quite a few other things on my plate, but I'd like to try it out sometime in the near future...

from pop.

I have to say, I'm really curious about adding this capability. I may circle back to this. I have a project that I believe could benefit from this. Of course the problem is timing. I am going to see if somehow, I could work this into the overall planning of the project.

from pop.