Supporting the kernel.org transparency log about trillian-examples HOT 5 OPEN

I don't think so. The work on having kernel.org working with omniwitness would imply having to write something that parses their current log into something compatible and have them parse it. It's more of a collaborative thing with the current kernel.org maintainers then a programming challenge. Probably need to chat with Konstantin to see what he is thinking around the future of transparency logs on kernel.org

from trillian-examples.

Hi Morten,

Yes, the omniwitness (and others here) are specifically targeted at verifying Merkle tree based logs, it'll be hard to have them support git trees (I suspect a consistency "proof" there is essentially a fast-forward merge of the intervening commits!)

The serverless log might be a good fit if you want to bring things closer in shape to some of the other transparency ecosystems - perhaps it might be worthwhile working through what a claimant model based description of such a system might be?

from trillian-examples.

Yes, I think the serverless log work is perfect for this use case. If you were to use that then the omniwitness work would be able to support your effort also.

from trillian-examples.

@Foxboron anything we can do to help you make progress with this?

from trillian-examples.