Does converting to TEI mean that all atom: information is now TEI Header? about cei2tei HOT 4 CLOSED

• If we are discarding the atom information, do we retain the atom revision histoy as part of revisionDesc?

For example:

    <atom:published>2015-02-16T11:42:01.515+02:00</atom:published>
    <atom:updated>2017-06-10T21:14:32.714+02:00</atom:updated>

as

<revisionDesc>
            <list>
                <item>
                    <date when="2015-02-16">16 Feb 2015</date>Source document originally published on Monasterium.net.</item>
                <item>
                    <date when="2017-06-10">10 June2017</date>Updated on Monasterium.net.</item>
            </list>
        </revisionDesc>

from cei2tei.

atom-wrapper contains some information on the edition process in MOM-CA. Usually only
<atom:id>, <atom:published>, <atom:updated>, atom:author/atom:email and atom:link are in use.
This could translate to tei:publicationStmt/tei:idno, teipublicationStmt/tei:date, tei:titleStmt/tei:editor and tei:notesStmt/tei:relatedItem, and of course, the tei:revisionDesc as you @larkvi describe above, I'd say.

from cei2tei.

Additionally we should consider if we use tei:sourceDesc to reference the original monasterium.net-publication or just stick to tei:notesStmt/tei:relatedItem/tei:ref (my current preference).

from cei2tei.

With All of this should be accounted for in the currrent version of the XSLT document.

from cei2tei.