Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (7)

Emprah avatar Emprah commented on May 30, 2024 1

Sorry for the late answer, i was quite busy - but just wanted to return the thank you for the follow up :)

from log-captor.

Hakky54 avatar Hakky54 commented on May 30, 2024

Hi @Emprah

Thank for reporting this issue and sharing the detailed code snippets! Could you retry with the latest version and tell me if the issue is still present? The latest version is 2.7.2 and is able to capturing logs within a multi thread setup.

from log-captor.

Emprah avatar Emprah commented on May 30, 2024

I tried again with 2.7.2, but no difference unfortunately...

from log-captor.

Hakky54 avatar Hakky54 commented on May 30, 2024

I have tried it locally and indeed I am getting the same behaviour which you mentioned. Reusing log captor works and I use it at some other places such as here: unit test example So I was amazed to see this issue.

I tried couple of different scenario's with the code snippet you have shared and I noticed that when I don't use SpringBootIntegrationTest annotation and try static field, with reusing logcaptor it works. So my assumption is that the spring annotation is messing things up for this specific setup. I investigated it but could not found the issue, so I ended up creating a stackoverflow question here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70259059/logcaptor-fails-to-capture-when-using-springboottest-annotation

For now I don't have a fix as I am not able to understand why the spring boot annotation messes logcaptor while using it as a static field. So I would suggest to use the following snippet for now till I have more info regarding this issue.

private LogCaptor logcaptor;

@BeforeEach
void setupLogCaptor() {
    logcaptor = LogCaptor.forClass(FooService.class);
}

@AfterEach
void closeLogCaptor() {
    logcaptor.close();
}

You could also use the following setup for the time being:

@SpringBootIntegrationTest
class TestClass {

    private LogCaptor logcaptor;
    private Sut sut;

    @Autowired
    TestClass(Sut sut) {
        this.sut = sut;
        this.logcaptor = LogCaptor.forClass(Sut.class);
    }
    
    @BeforeEach
    void beforeEach() {
        logcaptor.clearLogs();
    }

    private static Stream<List<String>> provideParameters() {
        return Stream.of(
                null,
                List.of()
        );
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("provideParameters")
    void testMethod(List<String> parameters) {
        CompletableFuture<void> future = sut.doStuff(parameters);
        assertThrows(Exception.class, () -> future.get(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
        assertThat(logcaptor.getErrorLogs()).containsExactly("Expected error message");
    }
}

or the following snippet:

@SpringBootIntegrationTest
class TestClass {

    private LogCaptor logcaptor;

    @Autowired    
    private Sut sut;

    @PostConstruct
    void init() {
        logcaptor = LogCaptor.forClass(Sut.class);
    }
    
    @BeforeEach
    void beforeEach() {
        logcaptor.clearLogs();
    }

    private static Stream<List<String>> provideParameters() {
        return Stream.of(
                null,
                List.of()
        );
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("provideParameters")
    void testMethod(List<String> parameters) {
        CompletableFuture<void> future = sut.doStuff(parameters);
        assertThrows(Exception.class, () -> future.get(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
        assertThat(logcaptor.getErrorLogs()).containsExactly("Expected error message");
    }
}

from log-captor.

Hakky54 avatar Hakky54 commented on May 30, 2024

I got a reply on this issue from someone on stackoverflow and he mentioned the following:

The problem in the failing test is that the class variable logcaptor is created before the test application context is created. During the bootstrapping of the test application context, Spring Boot will completely configure logback from scratch. This causes the appender that was added in LogCaptor::forClass to get lost.

In the successful @SpringBootTest tests, the appender is added in a much later stage of the context lifecycle.

You can get the test to pass when you take any of the two passing @SpringBootTest tests and execute them together as long as the failing test is not executed first. That's because the Spring test framework will not bootstrap a new context but re-use the context of the first test that was run. You can get the test back to failing if you annotate its class with @DirtiesContext(classMode = ClassMode.BEFORE_CLASS) because then again a new context will be created after the class variable logcaptor is assigned.

I'm afraid that there is little one can do about this. This comment on github by the Spring Boot team is about a similar problem: spring-projects/spring-boot#19323 (comment)

source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70310499/6777695

This issue is exactly the same as this one: spring-projects/spring-boot#19323 (comment) So I am not able to fix this on my side as it is a spring-boot related issue. So my advice would be to initialise LogCaptor after spring-boot has initialised the application context. This can be done by adding LogCaptor either in the BeforeAll, BeforeEach, Constructor, PostConstruct or in the test method.

So I am closing this issue as it is spring-boot related. Thank you for sharing this issue as it gave me more insight of how spring-boot is working and how LogCaptor is behaving in different kind of setups. I appreciate your investigation for the different scenario's 😊

from log-captor.

hoangbnc avatar hoangbnc commented on May 30, 2024

@Hakky54 maybe you could introduce something like resetCaptor (that reassigns internally) so we can just do

@BeforeEach
void setupLogCaptor() {
  logCaptor.resetCaptor();
}

for such cases?

from log-captor.

Hakky54 avatar Hakky54 commented on May 30, 2024

Hi @hoangbnc

Thank you for the suggestion, however this won't solve the root issue which is causing this different behavior. Adding a reset function and calling that in the before each is not different than just initializing it at that level. I think the ideal solution for this kind of use case or rather generic use case when using spring with junit 4 or 5 would be creating a junit-extension for logcaptor which would take away all of the verbosity for creating, resetting and disposal of logcaptor in the different test phases such as before all, before each, after each and after all.

from log-captor.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.