idea about webhook about harmony HOT 11 CLOSED

It's made by myself, but is this right?

I think it's okay but you should at least throw an error when the name is not valid.

And how about putting webhooks in ClientOption too?

What do you mean?

from harmony.

It's made by myself, but is this right?

I think it's okay but you should at least throw an error when the name is not valid.

okay, But if I throw an error in return, I can't solve it because there's an error.

And how about putting webhooks in ClientOption too?

What do you mean?

client.<Webhook>

from harmony.

ex) new Webhook(id, token)

Thanks to @DjDeveloperr

from harmony.

why use client.? webhooks are server related not bot related

from harmony.

why use client.? webhooks are server related not bot related

It seemed necessary because there was a client in the first code

from harmony.

why use client.? webhooks are server related not bot related

It seemed necessary because there was a client in the first code

If I'm not wrong the first code meant the client makes a webhook for themselves in the server where it was used.(correct me if am wrong)

from harmony.

So, can I just not use the client? @6days9weeks

from harmony.

You can use client I'm not saying you can't but what would be the possible use for it in ClientOption, auto-webhook for the bot?

from harmony.

idk

from harmony.

lmao, then if you want to then add it

from harmony.

okay

from harmony.