Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (5)

jethrolarson avatar jethrolarson commented on May 21, 2024

Constant is also the name of a type that is a monad. I don't know if that
should be mentioned on the doc though

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 2:06 AM Olivier Gérardin [email protected]
wrote:

I think it's not correct to define a constant as a variable that can only
be assigned once; that's the mechanism that most programming languages use
to implement constants, but it's not a definition.
I would just define it as a symbolic name for a value.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#78, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB-4JnmIZ9lmKsfqGQh8MAVTYBxlHCeks5qZc4YgaJpZM4JU71-
.

from functional-programming-jargon.

jethrolarson avatar jethrolarson commented on May 21, 2024

I guess the current definition is more of const than the concept. If we define it as a symbolic name for a value then what distinguishes it from a variable?

from functional-programming-jargon.

ogerardin avatar ogerardin commented on May 21, 2024

The only difference is that a variable's value can change over time. But we know that in pure functional world there is no such thing as a variable anyway :)

from functional-programming-jargon.

jethrolarson avatar jethrolarson commented on May 21, 2024

In a pure functional world variables are like math variables. If you say x
= 1 then later say it's 2 you're just being a ridiculous lier

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016, 12:25 AM Olivier Gérardin [email protected]
wrote:

The only difference is that a variable's value can change over time. But
we know that in pure functional world there is no such thing as a variable
anyway :)


You are receiving this because you commented.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#78 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB-4NXo-M7-ZZusQUalgMkTzUOjNwELks5qaFl3gaJpZM4JU71-
.

from functional-programming-jargon.

stereobooster avatar stereobooster commented on May 21, 2024

That is, they can be replaced with the values that they represent without affecting the result.

true, but this will work if only n is known value:

const fact = n => n < 2 ? 1 : n * fact(n-1)

from functional-programming-jargon.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.