"Expected Expression" Error about customasm HOT 4 CLOSED

I couldn't quite reproduce the exact error you mentioned without a proper test case, but I got a similar one, and I think I was able to fix the core issue. Could you please test the new version (it's also in the nightly Release) to check if your problem has been solved as well?

By the way, I've also made directive names case-insensitive, but no customizable bank fill value yet.

from customasm.

using the exact same code and CPU file i now get a different error:

Z:\Logisim\CPU_65C02V\CASM>customasm.exe testing2.C02C
customasm v0.10.6-8-ga4477b7 (2020-06-13, x86_64-pc-windows-gnu)
assembling `testing2.C02C`...

testing2.C02C:31:2 31:16:
error: failed to resolve instruction
  29 |
  30 | START:
  31 |   BBR 0,0,.TESTR
     |   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  32 |   HLT
  33 |
     testing2.C02C:31:2 31:16:
     error: address is out of bank range
       29 |
       30 | START:
       31 |   BBR 0,0,.TESTR
          |   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       32 |   HLT
       33 |

testing2.C02C:35:2 35:16:
error: failed to resolve instruction
  33 |
  34 |   .TESTR:
  35 |   BBS 0,0,.TESTS
     |   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  36 |   HLT
  37 |
     testing2.C02C:35:2 35:16:
     error: address is out of bank range
       33 |
       34 |   .TESTR:
       35 |   BBS 0,0,.TESTS
          |   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       36 |   HLT
       37 |

overall i'm confused why this even happens, it's just a regular instruction with 3 parameters, i've done more with some RISC based CPUs so why is this such an issue?

here the full CPU file, and file i'm testing this with, so you can hopefully reproduce this:
CPU FILE (pastebin)
ASM FILE (pastebin)

and thanks for the changes to case sensitivity. it's really amazing that you do these changes and how quickly as well.

from customasm.

Ok, I think I got it now! Can you try it on the new Nightly build?

It was an issue with bank range checks for instructions that use forward-referenced labels. It was a bit tricky to solve, but I think it happened because my code was too messy. I think it's in need of a big refactoring.

from customasm.

Sorry it was late and i got to bed.
I did try the newest build and it did assemble, and looking at the binary file it seems correct.
Awesome!
thanks man!

from customasm.