helm-docs version report issue about homebrew-core HOT 7 CLOSED

When they are distributed by the application creator, yes you should :-)

No, it looks like we're fine: https://github.com/norwoodj/helm-docs/blob/master/LICENSE

from homebrew-core.

Sure thanks you. I am just saying if software author is providing a tap that work whereas Homebrew version not, well, we should use the TAP.

We disagree. This fragments the Homebrew userbase and prevents users from using brew search and brew install without having to seek out separate taps on their own. Something in the main Homebrew/core repository can be immediately installed with brew install.

Also about license, from docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Formulae I can read

"Our policy is that formulae in the core tap (homebrew/core) must be open-source with a Debian Free Software Guidelines license"

GPL license is fine isnit?

What I'm saying is that everything in Homebrew/core is licensed under a OSI-approved license. Meaning that we (and anyone else) are free to build and redistribute those projects. We outright reject the notion of upstream "maintaining control" as antithetical to the values of open source.

from homebrew-core.

This will be fixed by #172402. We do not remove formulae simply because they are also distributed elsewhere.

from homebrew-core.

See https://docs.brew.sh/How-to-Create-and-Maintain-a-Tap#official-vendor-taps

from homebrew-core.

This will be fixed by #172402. We do not remove formulae simply because they are also distributed elsewhere.

When they are distributed by the application creator, yes you should :-)

from homebrew-core.

When they are distributed by the application creator, yes you should :-)

What a grotesque notion. That's not how any of this works. I suggest you actually read the full text of GPLv3 instead of attempting to tell us how to run our project, which is doing just fine.

from homebrew-core.

When they are distributed by the application creator, yes you should :-)

What a grotesque notion. That's not how any of this works. I suggest you actually read the full text of GPLv3 instead of attempting to tell us how to run our project, which is doing just fine.

Sure thanks you. I am just saying if software author is providing a tap that work whereas Homebrew version not, well, we should use the TAP.

Also about license, from https://docs.brew.sh/Acceptable-Formulae I can read

"Our policy is that formulae in the core tap (homebrew/core) must be open-source with a Debian Free Software Guidelines license"

GPL license is fine isnit?

No drama, sorry if I was rude, thanks you to maintain a such useful project I am using almost every week!

from homebrew-core.