Giter VIP home page Giter VIP logo

Comments (15)

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

Actually JavaScript code in content-script.js does have access to the page -exactly same as Firefox. So by logical reasoning, it ought to work in the same way in both browsers.

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Here's the problem: in Firefox

  • content-script.js injects patch-classic-io.js into the page
  • patch-classic-io.js modifies window.mozillaLoadFile and others;

in Chrome patch-classic-io.js is injected, but it gets a sandboxed context and window is not the same as window, so the change that patch-classic-io.js introduces doesn't really affect window.mozillaLoadFile etc of the page itself. That answer at SO suggests a hack that can help though. I'll probably give it a try soon; this will make the code ugly though because the whole patch-classic-io.js should be put as a JS string inside content-script.js.

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

What if we add the code in the patch to the content-script itself - as a function? Instead of inject, we can call it as a function, right?

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Not sure, could you provide a sample code?

The following seems to work:

  1. change injectExtensionScript to this:

    function injectExtensionScript(text) {
      const scriptElement = document.createElement("script");
      scriptElement.innerHTML = text;
      document.head.appendChild(scriptElement);
      scriptElement.remove();
    }
    
  2. call it (instead of injectExtensionScript('patch-classic.io)) like this:

  injectExtensionScript(`
	window.mozillaLoadFile = function(path) {
	  try {
		// Just read the file synchronously
		var xhReq = new XMLHttpRequest();
		xhReq.open("GET", "file:///" + encodeURIComponent(path), false);
		xhReq.send(null);
		return xhReq.responseText;
	  } catch(ex) {
		return false;
	  }
	};

	window.mozillaSaveFile = function(path, content) {
	  var messageBox = document.getElementById("tiddlyfox-message-box");
	  if(!messageBox) return false;

	  // Create the message element and put it into the message box
	  var message = document.createElement("div");
	  message.setAttribute("data-tiddlyfox-path", path);
	  message.setAttribute("data-tiddlyfox-content", content);
	  messageBox.appendChild(message);

	  // Create and dispatch the custom event to the extension
	  var event = document.createEvent("Events");
	  event.initEvent("tiddlyfox-save-file", true, false);
	  message.dispatchEvent(event);

	  return true;
	};

	// expose the supported I/O events
	window.eventBasedIO = {
		save: {
			name: 'tiddlyfox-save-file'
		},
		saved: {
			name: 'tiddlyfox-have-saved-file'
		}
	};`);

(sorry for ugly formatting, github markup makes it a bit difficult)

However, while this injecting works in extension edited locally, it doesn't seem to find the Timimi backend, so I've only succeeded with saving when activated both current Timimi extension and my local version. Any idea how can I fix this?

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

You mean you want to create a local environment for testing purposes?

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Yes, that would be helpful (so that I can create PRs with more confidence)

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Actually, that worked in Firefox: I loaded Timimi extension from cloned and edited repo on local file system and it interacted with Timimi backend just like the main extension. Not sure why this is not the case in Chrome (well, in Vivaldi, I haven't tested this in Chrome yet)

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

Yeah. Chrome works a little differently. You need to edit the timimi.json for it to work with chrome in testing environment.

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

Here is what you have to do.
Uninstall timimi that you may have installed from chrome webstore
Load the unpacked extension to Chrome.
In the extension page, timimi will have an extension id. Copy that.
Now go to timimi.json and replace the extension id in that with the value you copied

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

well, this doesn't seem to be working. To be sure, I've retested in Chrome (instead of Vivaldi), but it's the same:

  1. I have installed the unpacked extension
  2. copied the id, opened <user folder>\AppData\Roaming\Timimi-Chrome\Timimi.json (is it the one?), changed allowed_origins by substituting the id
  3. opened TWC 2.9.2, checked that the script is injected (mozillaSaveFile changed etc), added some changes, (unchecked saving backups,) called saving

A message (more likely browser than native, white one with Timimi icon) appeared saying "Timimi save FAILED Error on contacting Timimi host" and the changes are not saved. I'll probably create a PR in parallel (not sure where the changes should go though: they can be used for Firefox too and it's not nice if the code is duplicated anyway, since further changes should be remembered to be put into both)

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Hi Riz, any comments on this? What do you think about merging #48 so that we can use this minimal implementation in the next release and improve it further if needed?

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

Merged. Now the only thing we have to see is if it passes the chrome store's security check.

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Great, thanks! Yeah, the security check is indeed is an interesting question because such code injection may be considered "hacky".

By the way, do you have any plans to de-duplicate code for Firefox and Chrome extensions? Like generate one from another, so that it is enough to introduce new changes only in one place.

from timimi.

ibnishak avatar ibnishak commented on May 20, 2024

The plan is to make the code similar in both eventually.

from timimi.

YakovL avatar YakovL commented on May 20, 2024

Hi Riz,

we have to see is if it passes the chrome store's security check

any news on this? What's the usual time they take to review an updated version?

from timimi.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.