`arraycontext.container.to_numpy` semantics about arraycontext HOT 8 CLOSED

As the one responsible for the current code.. Agreed!

from arraycontext.

IIUC, you're proposing that ArrayContext.{from,to}_numpy should support containers?

from arraycontext.

IIUC, you're proposing that ArrayContext.{from,to}_numpy should support containers?

No, just that the logic of what array types are legal to be frozen must be moved the respective implementations. I found this condition:

from arraycontext.

For my understanding, why doesn't PytatoPyOpenCLArrayContext advertise support for both the frozen and unfrozen array types? i.e. for both pt.Array and cl.Array.

from arraycontext.

Agree with @alexfikl, that seems like a relatively clean thing to do.

from arraycontext.

That was because operations like pt.Array+cla.Array aren't defined.

from arraycontext.

That was because operations like pt.Array+cla.Array aren't defined.

I think that's alright. array_types just says "these are the possible types that come out of this". It doesn't need to entail a promise of interoperability.

• If we decide we like this disclaimer, we should add it to the docs.

from arraycontext.

I agree, I like this. I'll change #160 to implement this. Thanks to both!

from arraycontext.